Australia vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita

Australia
100.0%
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina
100.0%
in 2024
Australia rank
54th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
55th

Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Australia
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Australia currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 54th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 55th of 231 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Bosnia and Herzegovina Difference Ahead
2000s 99.8% 98.9% 0.8% Australia
2010s 99.9% 99.8% 0.2% Australia
2020s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita, Australia or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Australia, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita between Australia and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
0.0%, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Australia and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita?
Australia ranks 54th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 55th of 231 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/improved-water-sources-vs-gdp-per-capita/australia/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/improved-water-sources-vs-gdp-per-capita/australia/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Australia vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
231 places, 5,586 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.