Belarus vs Tonga: Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita
Belarus
99.9%
in 2024
Tonga
99.8%
in 2024
Belarus rank
70th
Tonga rank
73rd
Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita over time
- Belarus
- Tonga
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 99.9% against 99.8% in Tonga, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 70th and Tonga ranks 73rd of 231 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.5% | 99.0% | 0.5% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 99.7% | 99.4% | 0.3% | Belarus |
| 2020s | 99.9% | 99.8% | 0.1% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita, Belarus or Tonga?
- Belarus, at 99.9% against 99.8% in Tonga as of 2024.
- What is the difference in using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita between Belarus and Tonga?
- 0.1%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Tonga?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Tonga rank globally for using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita?
- Belarus ranks 70th and Tonga ranks 73rd of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.