Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs New Zealand: Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
100.0%
in 2024
New Zealand
100.0%
in 2024
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st

Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
  • New Zealand
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 25 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 231 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 98.9% 100.0% 1.1% New Zealand
2010s 99.6% 100.0% 0.4% New Zealand
2020s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba or New Zealand?
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba, at 100.0% against 100.0% in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita between Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and New Zealand?
0.0%, with Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and New Zealand?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and New Zealand rank globally for using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita?
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 231 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs New Zealand: Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/improved-water-sources-vs-gdp-per-capita/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/improved-water-sources-vs-gdp-per-capita/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/new-zealand/">Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs New Zealand: Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
231 places, 5,586 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.