Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Northern Mariana Islands: Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
100.0%
in 2024
Northern Mariana Islands
100.0%
in 2024
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
1st
Northern Mariana Islands rank
1st

Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
  • Northern Mariana Islands
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Northern Mariana Islands, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 1st and Northern Mariana Islands ranks 1st of 231 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba averaged higher in 2 and Northern Mariana Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba Northern Mariana Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 98.9% 97.3% 1.6% Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
2010s 99.6% 99.2% 0.4% Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
2020s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% Northern Mariana Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba or Northern Mariana Islands?
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Northern Mariana Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita between Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Northern Mariana Islands?
0.0%, with Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Northern Mariana Islands?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Northern Mariana Islands rank globally for using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita?
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 1st and Northern Mariana Islands ranks 1st of 231 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Northern Mariana Islands: Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/improved-water-sources-vs-gdp-per-capita/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/northern-mariana-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/improved-water-sources-vs-gdp-per-capita/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/northern-mariana-islands/">Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Northern Mariana Islands: Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
231 places, 5,586 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.