Central African Republic vs Papua New Guinea: Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita

Central African Republic
63.3%
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
60.6%
in 2024
Central African Republic rank
228th
Papua New Guinea rank
229th

Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Papua New Guinea
0204060200020122024

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 63.3% against 60.6% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 2.7%.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 228th and Papua New Guinea ranks 229th of 231 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 66.0% 32.5% 33.5% Central African Republic
2010s 63.8% 46.0% 17.8% Central African Republic
2020s 63.0% 57.5% 5.5% Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita, Central African Republic or Papua New Guinea?
Central African Republic, at 63.3% against 60.6% in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita between Central African Republic and Papua New Guinea?
2.7%, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Papua New Guinea?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Central African Republic and Papua New Guinea rank globally for using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita?
Central African Republic ranks 228th and Papua New Guinea ranks 229th of 231 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Papua New Guinea: Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/improved-water-sources-vs-gdp-per-capita/central-african-republic/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/improved-water-sources-vs-gdp-per-capita/central-african-republic/papua-new-guinea/">Central African Republic vs Papua New Guinea: Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
231 places, 5,586 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.