Cuba vs Jersey: Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita
Cuba
97.8%
in 2024
Jersey
98.0%
in 2024
Cuba rank
138th
Jersey rank
135th
Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita over time
- Cuba
- Jersey
How they compare
Jersey currently reports 98.0% against 97.8% in Cuba, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Jersey has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 138th and Jersey ranks 135th of 231 countries.
Jersey has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Jersey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.9% | 97.7% | 1.8% | Jersey |
| 2010s | 96.7% | 97.8% | 1.1% | Jersey |
| 2020s | 97.6% | 98.0% | 0.5% | Jersey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita, Cuba or Jersey?
- Jersey, at 98.0% against 97.8% in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita between Cuba and Jersey?
- 0.2%, with Jersey ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Jersey?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Jersey rank globally for using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita?
- Cuba ranks 138th and Jersey ranks 135th of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.