Grenada vs Mayotte: Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita
Grenada
96.8%
in 2017
Mayotte
96.4%
in 2023
Grenada rank
152nd
Mayotte rank
155th
Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita over time
- Grenada
- Mayotte
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 96.8% against 96.4% in Mayotte, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Mayotte ahead.
Grenada ranks 152nd and Mayotte ranks 155th of 231 countries.
Mayotte has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Mayotte | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.2% | 97.3% | 1.1% | Mayotte |
| 2010s | 96.9% | 96.9% | 0.1% | Mayotte |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita, Grenada or Mayotte?
- Grenada, at 96.8% against 96.4% in Mayotte as of 2017.
- What is the difference in using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita between Grenada and Mayotte?
- 0.4%, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Mayotte?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Grenada and Mayotte rank globally for using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita?
- Grenada ranks 152nd and Mayotte ranks 155th of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.