Grenada vs Nepal: Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita
Grenada
96.8%
in 2017
Nepal
97.1%
in 2024
Grenada rank
152nd
Nepal rank
149th
Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita over time
- Grenada
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 97.1% against 96.8% in Grenada, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 152nd and Nepal ranks 149th of 231 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.5% | 84.1% | 11.4% | Grenada |
| 2010s | 96.9% | 90.3% | 6.6% | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita, Grenada or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 97.1% against 96.8% in Grenada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita between Grenada and Nepal?
- 0.3%, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Nepal?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Grenada and Nepal rank globally for using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita?
- Grenada ranks 152nd and Nepal ranks 149th of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.