Mayotte vs Peru: Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita
Mayotte
96.4%
in 2023
Peru
96.2%
in 2024
Mayotte rank
155th
Peru rank
158th
Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita over time
- Mayotte
- Peru
How they compare
Mayotte currently reports 96.4% against 96.2% in Peru, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Mayotte has been ahead every year.
Mayotte ranks 155th and Peru ranks 158th of 231 regions.
Mayotte has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mayotte | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 97.3% | 86.8% | 10.5% | Mayotte |
| 2010s | 96.8% | 90.9% | 5.9% | Mayotte |
| 2020s | 96.4% | 94.8% | 1.6% | Mayotte |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita, Mayotte or Peru?
- Mayotte, at 96.4% against 96.2% in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita between Mayotte and Peru?
- 0.2%, with Mayotte ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mayotte and Peru?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Mayotte and Peru rank globally for using improved drinking water sources vs. gdp per capita?
- Mayotte ranks 155th and Peru ranks 158th of 231 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved drinking water sources vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.