Egypt vs Jamaica: Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita
Egypt
0.0001 m3 per person
in 2024
Jamaica
0.0002 m3 per person
in 2024
Egypt rank
108th
Jamaica rank
106th
Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita over time
- Egypt
- Jamaica
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 0.0002 m3 per person against 0.0001 m3 per person in Egypt, a difference of 0.0001 m3 per person.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 2.7 times Egypt's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 108th and Jamaica ranks 106th of 126 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0001 m3 per person | 0.0001 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 0.0001 m3 per person | 0.0002 m3 per person | 0.0001 m3 per person | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher industrial roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita, Egypt or Jamaica?
- Jamaica, at 0.0002 m3 per person against 0.0001 m3 per person in Egypt as of 2024.
- What is the difference in industrial roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita between Egypt and Jamaica?
- 0.0001 m3 per person, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Jamaica?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Jamaica rank globally for industrial roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita?
- Egypt ranks 108th and Jamaica ranks 106th of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.