Gambia vs Jamaica: Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita
Gambia
0.0004 m3 per person
in 2024
Jamaica
0.0002 m3 per person
in 2024
Gambia rank
103rd
Jamaica rank
106th
Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita over time
- Gambia
- Jamaica
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0.0004 m3 per person against 0.0002 m3 per person in Jamaica, a difference of 0.0002 m3 per person.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.8 times Jamaica's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 103rd and Jamaica ranks 106th of 126 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0004 m3 per person | 0.0001 m3 per person | 0.0003 m3 per person | Gambia |
| 2020s | 0.0004 m3 per person | 0.0002 m3 per person | 0.0002 m3 per person | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher industrial roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita, Gambia or Jamaica?
- Gambia, at 0.0004 m3 per person against 0.0002 m3 per person in Jamaica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in industrial roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita between Gambia and Jamaica?
- 0.0002 m3 per person, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Jamaica?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Gambia and Jamaica rank globally for industrial roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita?
- Gambia ranks 103rd and Jamaica ranks 106th of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.