Gambia vs Mozambique: Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita
Gambia
0.0004 m3 per person
in 2024
Mozambique
0.0003 m3 per person
in 2024
Gambia rank
103rd
Mozambique rank
105th
Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita over time
- Gambia
- Mozambique
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0.0004 m3 per person against 0.0003 m3 per person in Mozambique, a difference of 0.0001 m3 per person.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.3 times Mozambique's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Gambia has been ahead every year.
Gambia ranks 103rd and Mozambique ranks 105th of 126 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0004 m3 per person | 0.0004 m3 per person | 0.0001 m3 per person | Gambia |
| 2020s | 0.0004 m3 per person | 0.0003 m3 per person | 0.0001 m3 per person | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher industrial roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita, Gambia or Mozambique?
- Gambia, at 0.0004 m3 per person against 0.0003 m3 per person in Mozambique as of 2024.
- What is the difference in industrial roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita between Gambia and Mozambique?
- 0.0001 m3 per person, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Mozambique?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Gambia and Mozambique rank globally for industrial roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita?
- Gambia ranks 103rd and Mozambique ranks 105th of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.