Ghana vs Panama: Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita
Ghana
0.0015 m3 per person
in 2024
Panama
0.0016 m3 per person
in 2024
Ghana rank
93rd
Panama rank
92nd
Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita over time
- Ghana
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 0.0016 m3 per person against 0.0015 m3 per person in Ghana, a difference of 0.0001 m3 per person.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Ghana's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 93rd and Panama ranks 92nd of 126 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0018 m3 per person | 0.0014 m3 per person | 0.0004 m3 per person | Ghana |
| 2020s | 0.0015 m3 per person | 0.0016 m3 per person | 0.0001 m3 per person | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher industrial roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita, Ghana or Panama?
- Panama, at 0.0016 m3 per person against 0.0015 m3 per person in Ghana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in industrial roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita between Ghana and Panama?
- 0.0001 m3 per person, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Panama?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Ghana and Panama rank globally for industrial roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita?
- Ghana ranks 93rd and Panama ranks 92nd of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.