Laos vs Sri Lanka: Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita
Laos
0 m3 per person
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 m3 per person
in 2024
Laos rank
109th
Sri Lanka rank
109th
Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita over time
- Laos
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Laos currently reports 0 m3 per person against 0 m3 per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Laos ahead.
Laos ranks 109th and Sri Lanka ranks 109th of 126 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0552 m3 per person | 0.0016 m3 per person | 0.0536 m3 per person | Laos |
| 2000s | 0 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | — |
| 2010s | 0 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher industrial roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita, Laos or Sri Lanka?
- Laos, at 0 m3 per person against 0 m3 per person in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in industrial roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita between Laos and Sri Lanka?
- 0 m3 per person, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Sri Lanka?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Laos and Sri Lanka rank globally for industrial roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita?
- Laos ranks 109th and Sri Lanka ranks 109th of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.