Moldova vs Suriname: Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita
Moldova
0 m3 per person
in 2024
Suriname
0 m3 per person
in 2024
Moldova rank
109th
Suriname rank
109th
Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita over time
- Moldova
- Suriname
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 0 m3 per person against 0 m3 per person in Suriname, a difference of 0 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Suriname ahead.
Moldova ranks 109th and Suriname ranks 109th of 126 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Moldova averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 m3 per person | 0.0014 m3 per person | 0.0014 m3 per person | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0.0002 m3 per person | 0.0002 m3 per person | 0.0001 m3 per person | Moldova |
| 2020s | 0.0003 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | 0.0003 m3 per person | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher industrial roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita, Moldova or Suriname?
- Moldova, at 0 m3 per person against 0 m3 per person in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in industrial roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita between Moldova and Suriname?
- 0 m3 per person, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Suriname?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Moldova and Suriname rank globally for industrial roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita?
- Moldova ranks 109th and Suriname ranks 109th of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.