Myanmar vs Pakistan: Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita
Myanmar
0.0066 m3 per person
in 2024
Pakistan
0.0061 m3 per person
in 2024
Myanmar rank
79th
Pakistan rank
81st
Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita over time
- Myanmar
- Pakistan
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 0.0066 m3 per person against 0.0061 m3 per person in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0005 m3 per person.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Pakistan ahead.
Myanmar ranks 79th and Pakistan ranks 81st of 126 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0069 m3 per person | 0.0071 m3 per person | 0.0002 m3 per person | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 0.0067 m3 per person | 0.0063 m3 per person | 0.0004 m3 per person | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher industrial roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita, Myanmar or Pakistan?
- Myanmar, at 0.0066 m3 per person against 0.0061 m3 per person in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in industrial roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita between Myanmar and Pakistan?
- 0.0005 m3 per person, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Pakistan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Myanmar and Pakistan rank globally for industrial roundwood, coniferous — production, per capita?
- Myanmar ranks 79th and Pakistan ranks 81st of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Industrial roundwood, coniferous — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.