Ecuador vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Industrial roundwood — Export quantity, annual growth rate

Ecuador
52.38 % change on previous year
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
-28.46 % change on previous year
in 2024
Ecuador rank
25th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
28th

Industrial roundwood — Export quantity, annual growth rate over time

  • Ecuador
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
0200400196219932024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 52.38 % change on previous year against -28.46 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 80.84 % change on previous year.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.8 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.

Ecuador ranks 25th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 28th of 195 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 72.62 % change on previous year 5.59 % change on previous year 67.03 % change on previous year Ecuador
2000s 7.83 % change on previous year -1.36 % change on previous year 9.2 % change on previous year Ecuador
2010s 20.61 % change on previous year 8.11 % change on previous year 12.49 % change on previous year Ecuador
2020s 28.6 % change on previous year -10.07 % change on previous year 38.67 % change on previous year Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industrial roundwood — export quantity, annual growth rate, Ecuador or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Ecuador, at 52.38 % change on previous year against -28.46 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in industrial roundwood — export quantity, annual growth rate between Ecuador and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
80.84 % change on previous year, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for industrial roundwood — export quantity, annual growth rate?
Ecuador ranks 25th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 28th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industrial roundwood — Export quantity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Industrial roundwood — Export quantity, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/industrial-roundwood-export-quantity-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/industrial-roundwood-export-quantity-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Ecuador vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Industrial roundwood — Export quantity, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industrial roundwood — Export quantity, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 9,044 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Industrial roundwood — Export quantity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.