Ecuador vs Eswatini: Industrial roundwood — Export quantity, per capita
Ecuador
0.0296 m3 per person
in 2024
Eswatini
0.031 m3 per person
in 2024
Ecuador rank
34th
Eswatini rank
32nd
Industrial roundwood — Export quantity, per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.031 m3 per person against 0.0296 m3 per person in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0014 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 34th and Eswatini ranks 32nd of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0038 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | 0.0038 m3 per person | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0.0125 m3 per person | 0.0174 m3 per person | 0.0049 m3 per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.0219 m3 per person | 0.0225 m3 per person | 0.0006 m3 per person | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher industrial roundwood — export quantity, per capita, Ecuador or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 0.031 m3 per person against 0.0296 m3 per person in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in industrial roundwood — export quantity, per capita between Ecuador and Eswatini?
- 0.0014 m3 per person, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Eswatini?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Eswatini rank globally for industrial roundwood — export quantity, per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 34th and Eswatini ranks 32nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Industrial roundwood — Export quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Industrial roundwood — Export quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.