Libya vs Nepal: Industrial roundwood — Export quantity, per unit of GDP
Libya
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Nepal
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Libya rank
124th
Nepal rank
124th
Industrial roundwood — Export quantity, per unit of GDP over time
- Libya
- Nepal
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Nepal, a difference of 0 m3 per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Nepal ahead.
Libya ranks 124th and Nepal ranks 124th of 180 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Nepal |
| 2000s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Nepal |
| 2010s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Nepal |
| 2020s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher industrial roundwood — export quantity, per unit of gdp, Libya or Nepal?
- Libya, at 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in industrial roundwood — export quantity, per unit of gdp between Libya and Nepal?
- 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Nepal?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Nepal rank globally for industrial roundwood — export quantity, per unit of gdp?
- Libya ranks 124th and Nepal ranks 124th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Industrial roundwood — Export quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Industrial roundwood — Export quantity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.