Gambia vs Iraq: Industrial roundwood — Export value, per unit of GDP
Gambia
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Iraq
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Gambia rank
127th
Iraq rank
127th
Industrial roundwood — Export value, per unit of GDP over time
- Gambia
- Iraq
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Iraq, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 127th and Iraq ranks 127th of 180 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Gambia |
| 2020s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher industrial roundwood — export value, per unit of gdp, Gambia or Iraq?
- Gambia, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Iraq as of 2024.
- What is the difference in industrial roundwood — export value, per unit of gdp between Gambia and Iraq?
- 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Iraq?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Gambia and Iraq rank globally for industrial roundwood — export value, per unit of gdp?
- Gambia ranks 127th and Iraq ranks 127th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Industrial roundwood — Export value, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Industrial roundwood — Export value divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.