Greenland vs Iraq: Industrial roundwood — Export value, per unit of GDP
Greenland
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Iraq
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Greenland rank
127th
Iraq rank
127th
Industrial roundwood — Export value, per unit of GDP over time
- Greenland
- Iraq
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Iraq, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Iraq has been ahead every year.
Greenland ranks 127th and Iraq ranks 127th of 180 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Iraq |
| 2020s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher industrial roundwood — export value, per unit of gdp, Greenland or Iraq?
- Greenland, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Iraq as of 2023.
- What is the difference in industrial roundwood — export value, per unit of gdp between Greenland and Iraq?
- 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Iraq?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Greenland and Iraq rank globally for industrial roundwood — export value, per unit of gdp?
- Greenland ranks 127th and Iraq ranks 127th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Industrial roundwood — Export value, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Industrial roundwood — Export value divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.