Belarus vs Mongolia: Industrial roundwood — Import quantity, per capita
Belarus
0 m3 per person
in 2024
Mongolia
0 m3 per person
in 2024
Belarus rank
172nd
Mongolia rank
172nd
Industrial roundwood — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Belarus
- Mongolia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0 m3 per person against 0 m3 per person in Mongolia, a difference of 0 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mongolia ahead.
Belarus ranks 172nd and Mongolia ranks 172nd of 184 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.005 m3 per person | 0.0041 m3 per person | 0.0009 m3 per person | Belarus |
| 2000s | 0.0082 m3 per person | 0.0024 m3 per person | 0.0058 m3 per person | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0.0029 m3 per person | 0.0003 m3 per person | 0.0026 m3 per person | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0.0061 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | 0.006 m3 per person | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher industrial roundwood — import quantity, per capita, Belarus or Mongolia?
- Belarus, at 0 m3 per person against 0 m3 per person in Mongolia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in industrial roundwood — import quantity, per capita between Belarus and Mongolia?
- 0 m3 per person, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Mongolia?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Mongolia rank globally for industrial roundwood — import quantity, per capita?
- Belarus ranks 172nd and Mongolia ranks 172nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Industrial roundwood — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Industrial roundwood — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.