Chile vs Nepal: Industrial roundwood — Import quantity, per capita
Chile
0 m3 per person
in 2024
Nepal
0 m3 per person
in 2024
Chile rank
159th
Nepal rank
156th
Industrial roundwood — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Chile
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 0 m3 per person against 0 m3 per person in Chile, a difference of 0 m3 per person.
That makes Nepal's figure about 2.4 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 159th and Nepal ranks 156th of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | Chile |
| 2000s | 0 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | Nepal |
| 2010s | 0.0003 m3 per person | 0.0001 m3 per person | 0.0002 m3 per person | Chile |
| 2020s | 0 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher industrial roundwood — import quantity, per capita, Chile or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 0 m3 per person against 0 m3 per person in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in industrial roundwood — import quantity, per capita between Chile and Nepal?
- 0 m3 per person, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Nepal?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Nepal rank globally for industrial roundwood — import quantity, per capita?
- Chile ranks 159th and Nepal ranks 156th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Industrial roundwood — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Industrial roundwood — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.