Eswatini vs Tajikistan: Industrial roundwood — Import quantity, per capita
Eswatini
0.0009 m3 per person
in 2024
Tajikistan
0.0007 m3 per person
in 2024
Eswatini rank
92nd
Tajikistan rank
95th
Industrial roundwood — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.0009 m3 per person against 0.0007 m3 per person in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.0002 m3 per person.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.4 times Tajikistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 92nd and Tajikistan ranks 95th of 184 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0021 m3 per person | 0.0016 m3 per person | 0.0006 m3 per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.0056 m3 per person | 0.0006 m3 per person | 0.005 m3 per person | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher industrial roundwood — import quantity, per capita, Eswatini or Tajikistan?
- Eswatini, at 0.0009 m3 per person against 0.0007 m3 per person in Tajikistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in industrial roundwood — import quantity, per capita between Eswatini and Tajikistan?
- 0.0002 m3 per person, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Tajikistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Tajikistan rank globally for industrial roundwood — import quantity, per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 92nd and Tajikistan ranks 95th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Industrial roundwood — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Industrial roundwood — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.