Fiji vs Uruguay: Industrial roundwood — Import quantity, per capita
Fiji
0.0033 m3 per person
in 2024
Uruguay
0.0027 m3 per person
in 2024
Fiji rank
70th
Uruguay rank
71st
Industrial roundwood — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Fiji
- Uruguay
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 0.0033 m3 per person against 0.0027 m3 per person in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0006 m3 per person.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.2 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Uruguay ahead.
Fiji ranks 70th and Uruguay ranks 71st of 184 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0003 m3 per person | 0.0015 m3 per person | 0.0012 m3 per person | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0.0022 m3 per person | 0.0022 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0.0009 m3 per person | 0.0027 m3 per person | 0.0018 m3 per person | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher industrial roundwood — import quantity, per capita, Fiji or Uruguay?
- Fiji, at 0.0033 m3 per person against 0.0027 m3 per person in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in industrial roundwood — import quantity, per capita between Fiji and Uruguay?
- 0.0006 m3 per person, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Uruguay?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Fiji and Uruguay rank globally for industrial roundwood — import quantity, per capita?
- Fiji ranks 70th and Uruguay ranks 71st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Industrial roundwood — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Industrial roundwood — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.