What is the difference in industrial roundwood — import value, per capita between Costa Rica and New Zealand?

0 1000 USD per person, with New Zealand ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and New Zealand?

58 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Industrial roundwood — Import value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Costa Rica vs New Zealand: Industrial roundwood — Import value, per capita

Costa Rica

0.0003 1000 USD per person

in 2024

New Zealand

0.0003 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Costa Rica rank

87th

New Zealand rank

84th

Industrial roundwood — Import value, per capita over time

Costa Rica
New Zealand

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.0003 1000 USD per person against 0.0003 1000 USD per person in Costa Rica, a difference of 0 1000 USD per person.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1964 it was New Zealand ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 87th and New Zealand ranks 84th of 184 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Costa Rica	New Zealand	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0001 1000 USD per person	0.0002 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	New Zealand
1970s	0.0002 1000 USD per person	0.0003 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	New Zealand
1980s	0.0002 1000 USD per person	0.0005 1000 USD per person	0.0003 1000 USD per person	New Zealand
1990s	0.0001 1000 USD per person	0.0003 1000 USD per person	0.0002 1000 USD per person	New Zealand
2000s	0.0001 1000 USD per person	0.0005 1000 USD per person	0.0004 1000 USD per person	New Zealand
2010s	0.0002 1000 USD per person	0.0008 1000 USD per person	0.0006 1000 USD per person	New Zealand
2020s	0.0004 1000 USD per person	0.0005 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industrial roundwood — import value, per capita, Costa Rica or New Zealand?: New Zealand, at 0.0003 1000 USD per person against 0.0003 1000 USD per person in Costa Rica as of 2024.
What is the difference in industrial roundwood — import value, per capita between Costa Rica and New Zealand?: 0 1000 USD per person, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and New Zealand?: 58 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2024.
How do Costa Rica and New Zealand rank globally for industrial roundwood — import value, per capita?: Costa Rica ranks 87th and New Zealand ranks 84th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Industrial roundwood — Import value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs New Zealand: Industrial roundwood — Import value, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/industrial-roundwood-import-value-per-capita/costa-rica/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/industrial-roundwood-import-value-per-capita/costa-rica/new-zealand/">Costa Rica vs New Zealand: Industrial roundwood — Import value, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Industrial roundwood — Import value, per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 185 places, 7,689 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 08 September 2026

Industrial roundwood — Import value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.