Australia vs Central African Republic: Industrial roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per square

Australia
1.42 m3 per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic
1.36 m3 per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
96th
Central African Republic rank
98th

Industrial roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per square over time

  • Australia
  • Central African Republic
0.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1.42 m3 per square kilometre against 1.36 m3 per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.06 m3 per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 96th and Central African Republic ranks 98th of 149 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Central African Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 1.18 m3 per square kilometre 0.5008 m3 per square kilometre 0.6797 m3 per square kilometre Australia
1970s 1.25 m3 per square kilometre 0.9056 m3 per square kilometre 0.3461 m3 per square kilometre Australia
1980s 1.39 m3 per square kilometre 0.7544 m3 per square kilometre 0.6401 m3 per square kilometre Australia
1990s 1.31 m3 per square kilometre 0.9573 m3 per square kilometre 0.3505 m3 per square kilometre Australia
2000s 1.56 m3 per square kilometre 1.37 m3 per square kilometre 0.1917 m3 per square kilometre Australia
2010s 1.62 m3 per square kilometre 1.15 m3 per square kilometre 0.4703 m3 per square kilometre Australia
2020s 1.44 m3 per square kilometre 1.36 m3 per square kilometre 0.0798 m3 per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industrial roundwood, non-coniferous — production, per square, Australia or Central African Republic?
Australia, at 1.42 m3 per square kilometre against 1.36 m3 per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in industrial roundwood, non-coniferous — production, per square between Australia and Central African Republic?
0.06 m3 per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Central African Republic?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Central African Republic rank globally for industrial roundwood, non-coniferous — production, per square?
Australia ranks 96th and Central African Republic ranks 98th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industrial roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Central African Republic: Industrial roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/industrial-roundwood-non-coniferous-production-per-square-kilometre/australia/central-african-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/industrial-roundwood-non-coniferous-production-per-square-kilometre/australia/central-african-republic/">Australia vs Central African Republic: Industrial roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industrial roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
m3 per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
150 places, 8,117 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industrial roundwood, non-coniferous — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.