Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Industrial roundwood — Production, annual growth rate

Belarus
7.88 % change on previous year
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
0.5345 % change on previous year
in 2024
Belarus rank
14th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
11th

Industrial roundwood — Production, annual growth rate over time

  • Belarus
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
-50050196219932024

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 7.88 % change on previous year against 0.5345 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 7.35 % change on previous year.

That makes Belarus's figure about 14.7 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.

Belarus ranks 14th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th of 184 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s -0.1356 % change on previous year 2.37 % change on previous year 2.51 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 2.38 % change on previous year 0.9681 % change on previous year 1.41 % change on previous year Belarus
2010s 9.49 % change on previous year 0.9301 % change on previous year 8.56 % change on previous year Belarus
2020s -2.03 % change on previous year 0.0332 % change on previous year 2.06 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industrial roundwood — production, annual growth rate, Belarus or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Belarus, at 7.88 % change on previous year against 0.5345 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in industrial roundwood — production, annual growth rate between Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
7.35 % change on previous year, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for industrial roundwood — production, annual growth rate?
Belarus ranks 14th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industrial roundwood — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Industrial roundwood — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/industrial-roundwood-production-annual-growth-rate/belarus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/industrial-roundwood-production-annual-growth-rate/belarus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Industrial roundwood — Production, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industrial roundwood — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,784 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Industrial roundwood — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.