France vs Luxembourg: Industrial roundwood — Production, per capita
France
0.3456 m3 per person
in 2024
Luxembourg
0.3376 m3 per person
in 2024
France rank
38th
Luxembourg rank
39th
Industrial roundwood — Production, per capita over time
- France
- Luxembourg
How they compare
France currently reports 0.3456 m3 per person against 0.3376 m3 per person in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.008 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was France ahead.
France ranks 38th and Luxembourg ranks 39th of 150 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, France averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4801 m3 per person | 0.5419 m3 per person | 0.0618 m3 per person | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0.3915 m3 per person | 0.5656 m3 per person | 0.1741 m3 per person | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 0.3619 m3 per person | 0.3609 m3 per person | 0.001 m3 per person | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher industrial roundwood — production, per capita, France or Luxembourg?
- France, at 0.3456 m3 per person against 0.3376 m3 per person in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in industrial roundwood — production, per capita between France and Luxembourg?
- 0.008 m3 per person, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Luxembourg?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do France and Luxembourg rank globally for industrial roundwood — production, per capita?
- France ranks 38th and Luxembourg ranks 39th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Industrial roundwood — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Industrial roundwood — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.