Latvia vs World: Industrial roundwood — Production, per capita
Latvia
6.19 m3 per person
in 2024
World
0.2402 m3 per person
in 2024
Latvia rank
2nd
World rank
1st
Industrial roundwood — Production, per capita over time
- Latvia
- World
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 6.19 m3 per person against 0.2402 m3 per person in World, a difference of 5.95 m3 per person.
That makes Latvia's figure about 25.8 times World's.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 2nd and World ranks 1st of 150 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | World | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.34 m3 per person | 0.2636 m3 per person | 2.08 m3 per person | Latvia |
| 2000s | 4.94 m3 per person | 0.2586 m3 per person | 4.69 m3 per person | Latvia |
| 2010s | 5.63 m3 per person | 0.2538 m3 per person | 5.37 m3 per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 6.54 m3 per person | 0.2494 m3 per person | 6.3 m3 per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher industrial roundwood — production, per capita, Latvia or World?
- Latvia, at 6.19 m3 per person against 0.2402 m3 per person in World as of 2024.
- What is the difference in industrial roundwood — production, per capita between Latvia and World?
- 5.95 m3 per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and World?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and World rank globally for industrial roundwood — production, per capita?
- Latvia ranks 2nd and World ranks 1st of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Industrial roundwood — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Industrial roundwood — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.