Eswatini vs Serbia: Inland waters — Area, per capita
Eswatini
0 1000 ha per person
in 2024
Serbia
0 1000 ha per person
in 2024
Eswatini rank
91st
Serbia rank
88th
Inland waters — Area, per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 91st and Serbia ranks 88th of 140 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inland waters — area, per capita, Eswatini or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in inland waters — area, per capita between Eswatini and Serbia?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Serbia rank globally for inland waters — area, per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 91st and Serbia ranks 88th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Inland waters — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Inland waters — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.