Portugal vs Rwanda: Inland waters — Area, per capita
Portugal
0 1000 ha per person
in 2024
Rwanda
0 1000 ha per person
in 2024
Portugal rank
92nd
Rwanda rank
94th
Inland waters — Area, per capita over time
- Portugal
- Rwanda
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
That makes Portugal's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Rwanda ahead.
Portugal ranks 92nd and Rwanda ranks 94th of 140 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Portugal averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Portugal | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inland waters — area, per capita, Portugal or Rwanda?
- Portugal, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in inland waters — area, per capita between Portugal and Rwanda?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Rwanda?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Portugal and Rwanda rank globally for inland waters — area, per capita?
- Portugal ranks 92nd and Rwanda ranks 94th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Inland waters — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Inland waters — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.