Cuba vs Latvia: Inland waters — Area, per unit of GDP
Cuba
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2020
Latvia
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Cuba rank
57th
Latvia rank
58th
Inland waters — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Cuba
- Latvia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 57th and Latvia ranks 58th of 139 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inland waters — area, per unit of gdp, Cuba or Latvia?
- Cuba, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in inland waters — area, per unit of gdp between Cuba and Latvia?
- 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Latvia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Cuba and Latvia rank globally for inland waters — area, per unit of gdp?
- Cuba ranks 57th and Latvia ranks 58th of 139 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Inland waters — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Inland waters — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.