Latvia vs Nigeria: Inland waters — Area, per unit of GDP
Latvia
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Nigeria
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia rank
58th
Nigeria rank
61st
Inland waters — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Latvia
- Nigeria
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Nigeria, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 58th and Nigeria ranks 61st of 139 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inland waters — area, per unit of gdp, Latvia or Nigeria?
- Latvia, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Nigeria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in inland waters — area, per unit of gdp between Latvia and Nigeria?
- 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Nigeria?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Nigeria rank globally for inland waters — area, per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 58th and Nigeria ranks 61st of 139 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Inland waters — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Inland waters — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.