Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uganda: Inland waters — Area

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
39,749 1000 ha
in 2024
Uganda
4,730 1000 ha
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
11th
Uganda rank
12th

Inland waters — Area over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Uganda
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922024

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 39,749 1000 ha against 4,730 1000 ha in Uganda, a difference of 35,019 1000 ha.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 8.4 times Uganda's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th and Uganda ranks 12th of 30 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 48,370 1000 ha 4,174 1000 ha 44,196 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1970s 48,414 1000 ha 4,174 1000 ha 44,240 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1980s 48,450 1000 ha 4,174 1000 ha 44,276 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 51,070 1000 ha 4,174 1000 ha 46,895 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 43,527 1000 ha 4,174 1000 ha 39,353 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 39,143 1000 ha 4,301 1000 ha 34,843 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 39,525 1000 ha 4,699 1000 ha 34,826 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher inland waters — area, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Uganda?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 39,749 1000 ha against 4,730 1000 ha in Uganda as of 2024.
What is the difference in inland waters — area between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uganda?
35,019 1000 ha, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uganda?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uganda rank globally for inland waters — area?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th and Uganda ranks 12th of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Inland waters — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uganda: Inland waters — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/inland-waters-area/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/inland-waters-area/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/uganda/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uganda: Inland waters — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Inland waters — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
209 places, 12,035 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.