Burundi vs Finland: Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Burundi
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 61.77 kg/ha against 59.21 kg/ha in Burundi, a difference of 2.56 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.
Burundi ranks 127th and Finland ranks 124th of 201 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 20.87 kg/ha | 44.95 kg/ha | 24.07 kg/ha | Finland |
| 1970s | 20.75 kg/ha | 57.68 kg/ha | 36.93 kg/ha | Finland |
| 1980s | 22.66 kg/ha | 63.53 kg/ha | 40.87 kg/ha | Finland |
| 1990s | 23.85 kg/ha | 58.89 kg/ha | 35.05 kg/ha | Finland |
| 2000s | 21.09 kg/ha | 70.36 kg/ha | 49.26 kg/ha | Finland |
| 2010s | 32 kg/ha | 65.21 kg/ha | 33.21 kg/ha | Finland |
| 2020s | 57.85 kg/ha | 60.69 kg/ha | 2.83 kg/ha | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Burundi or Finland?
- Finland, at 61.77 kg/ha against 59.21 kg/ha in Burundi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Burundi and Finland?
- 2.56 kg/ha, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Finland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Finland rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Burundi ranks 127th and Finland ranks 124th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).