Burundi vs North Macedonia: Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Burundi
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 59.99 kg/ha against 59.21 kg/ha in Burundi, a difference of 0.78 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Burundi ranks 127th and North Macedonia ranks 126th of 201 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 23.61 kg/ha | 83.98 kg/ha | 60.37 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 21.09 kg/ha | 71.88 kg/ha | 50.79 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 32 kg/ha | 79.61 kg/ha | 47.61 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 57.85 kg/ha | 67.49 kg/ha | 9.63 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Burundi or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 59.99 kg/ha against 59.21 kg/ha in Burundi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Burundi and North Macedonia?
- 0.78 kg/ha, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and North Macedonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and North Macedonia rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Burundi ranks 127th and North Macedonia ranks 126th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).