Canada vs Guatemala: Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Canada
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 105.31 kg/ha against 105.22 kg/ha in Canada, a difference of 0.09 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 74th and Guatemala ranks 73rd of 201 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 15.95 kg/ha | 28.46 kg/ha | 12.51 kg/ha | Guatemala |
| 1970s | 24.76 kg/ha | 46.61 kg/ha | 21.84 kg/ha | Guatemala |
| 1980s | 38.22 kg/ha | 59.51 kg/ha | 21.29 kg/ha | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 49.68 kg/ha | 88.4 kg/ha | 38.73 kg/ha | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 61.41 kg/ha | 86.41 kg/ha | 25 kg/ha | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 90.87 kg/ha | 112.06 kg/ha | 21.19 kg/ha | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 101.02 kg/ha | 111.2 kg/ha | 10.17 kg/ha | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Canada or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 105.31 kg/ha against 105.22 kg/ha in Canada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Canada and Guatemala?
- 0.09 kg/ha, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Guatemala?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Guatemala rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Canada ranks 74th and Guatemala ranks 73rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).