Costa Rica vs Qatar: Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Costa Rica
- Qatar
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 229.63 kg/ha against 227.45 kg/ha in Qatar, a difference of 2.18 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Qatar ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 24th and Qatar ranks 25th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 5 and Qatar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 64.18 kg/ha | 283.49 kg/ha | 219.31 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 1970s | 105.16 kg/ha | 234.19 kg/ha | 129.03 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 1980s | 141.17 kg/ha | 112.46 kg/ha | 28.71 kg/ha | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 206.55 kg/ha | 188.09 kg/ha | 18.47 kg/ha | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 198.23 kg/ha | 100.88 kg/ha | 97.34 kg/ha | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 244.86 kg/ha | 137.26 kg/ha | 107.6 kg/ha | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 236.11 kg/ha | 214.32 kg/ha | 21.8 kg/ha | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Costa Rica or Qatar?
- Costa Rica, at 229.63 kg/ha against 227.45 kg/ha in Qatar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Costa Rica and Qatar?
- 2.18 kg/ha, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Qatar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Qatar rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Costa Rica ranks 24th and Qatar ranks 25th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).