Côte d'Ivoire vs Kazakhstan: Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 16.62 kg/ha against 14.2 kg/ha in Kazakhstan, a difference of 2.42 kg/ha.
That makes Côte d'Ivoire's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 192nd and Kazakhstan ranks 194th of 201 countries.
Côte d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.18 kg/ha | 13.04 kg/ha | 4.15 kg/ha | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2000s | 15.27 kg/ha | 11.04 kg/ha | 4.23 kg/ha | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 14.92 kg/ha | 14.04 kg/ha | 0.8784 kg/ha | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2020s | 15.36 kg/ha | 13.9 kg/ha | 1.46 kg/ha | Côte d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Côte d'Ivoire or Kazakhstan?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 16.62 kg/ha against 14.2 kg/ha in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Côte d'Ivoire and Kazakhstan?
- 2.42 kg/ha, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Kazakhstan rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 192nd and Kazakhstan ranks 194th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).