Cyprus vs Honduras: Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Cyprus
- Honduras
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 98.66 kg/ha against 97.62 kg/ha in Honduras, a difference of 1.04 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 79th and Honduras ranks 80th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 6 and Honduras in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 31.42 kg/ha | 24.51 kg/ha | 6.91 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 1970s | 63.4 kg/ha | 26.5 kg/ha | 36.9 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 1980s | 91.79 kg/ha | 27.16 kg/ha | 64.63 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 1990s | 131.34 kg/ha | 45.36 kg/ha | 85.98 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2000s | 108.3 kg/ha | 73.94 kg/ha | 34.35 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 113.78 kg/ha | 84.81 kg/ha | 28.97 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 100.51 kg/ha | 102.58 kg/ha | 2.07 kg/ha | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Cyprus or Honduras?
- Cyprus, at 98.66 kg/ha against 97.62 kg/ha in Honduras as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Cyprus and Honduras?
- 1.04 kg/ha, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Honduras?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Honduras rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Cyprus ranks 79th and Honduras ranks 80th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).