Cyprus vs Mauritius: Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Cyprus
- Mauritius
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 98.66 kg/ha against 95.17 kg/ha in Mauritius, a difference of 3.49 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.
Cyprus ranks 79th and Mauritius ranks 82nd of 201 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 31.42 kg/ha | 127.61 kg/ha | 96.19 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 63.4 kg/ha | 122 kg/ha | 58.6 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 91.79 kg/ha | 128.3 kg/ha | 36.52 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 131.34 kg/ha | 154.79 kg/ha | 23.45 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 108.3 kg/ha | 165.03 kg/ha | 56.74 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 113.78 kg/ha | 155.81 kg/ha | 42.03 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 100.51 kg/ha | 112.37 kg/ha | 11.86 kg/ha | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Cyprus or Mauritius?
- Cyprus, at 98.66 kg/ha against 95.17 kg/ha in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Cyprus and Mauritius?
- 3.49 kg/ha, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Mauritius?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Mauritius rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Cyprus ranks 79th and Mauritius ranks 82nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).