Czechoslovakia vs Tunisia: Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 24.04 kg/ha against 22.31 kg/ha in Tunisia, a difference of 1.73 kg/ha.
That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 163rd and Tunisia ranks 166th of 186 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 20.68 kg/ha | 5.81 kg/ha | 14.87 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 32.24 kg/ha | 10.07 kg/ha | 22.16 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 39.09 kg/ha | 15.5 kg/ha | 23.59 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 28.82 kg/ha | 17.85 kg/ha | 10.97 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Czechoslovakia or Tunisia?
- Czechoslovakia, at 24.04 kg/ha against 22.31 kg/ha in Tunisia as of 1992.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Czechoslovakia and Tunisia?
- 1.73 kg/ha, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Tunisia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Tunisia rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 163rd and Tunisia ranks 166th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).