Dominican Republic vs Luxembourg: Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Dominican Republic
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 110.86 kg/ha against 108.9 kg/ha in Dominican Republic, a difference of 1.96 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 68th and Luxembourg ranks 67th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.09 kg/ha | 141.24 kg/ha | 43.16 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 112.55 kg/ha | 138.76 kg/ha | 26.21 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 127.21 kg/ha | 119.18 kg/ha | 8.03 kg/ha | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Dominican Republic or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 110.86 kg/ha against 108.9 kg/ha in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Dominican Republic and Luxembourg?
- 1.96 kg/ha, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Dominican Republic and Luxembourg rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Dominican Republic ranks 68th and Luxembourg ranks 67th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).