Ecuador vs Italy: Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Ecuador
- Italy
How they compare
Italy currently reports 108.42 kg/ha against 108.25 kg/ha in Ecuador, a difference of 0.17 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Italy ahead.
Ecuador ranks 70th and Italy ranks 69th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Italy in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 28.45 kg/ha | 70.64 kg/ha | 42.19 kg/ha | Italy |
| 1970s | 42.59 kg/ha | 112.46 kg/ha | 69.87 kg/ha | Italy |
| 1980s | 50.17 kg/ha | 137.45 kg/ha | 87.28 kg/ha | Italy |
| 1990s | 59.27 kg/ha | 132.42 kg/ha | 73.14 kg/ha | Italy |
| 2000s | 96.13 kg/ha | 123.52 kg/ha | 27.4 kg/ha | Italy |
| 2010s | 124.39 kg/ha | 118.95 kg/ha | 5.45 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 125.26 kg/ha | 108.09 kg/ha | 17.18 kg/ha | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Ecuador or Italy?
- Italy, at 108.42 kg/ha against 108.25 kg/ha in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Ecuador and Italy?
- 0.17 kg/ha, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Italy?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Italy rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Ecuador ranks 70th and Italy ranks 69th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).