Ethiopia PDR vs Kiribati: Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 11.92 kg/ha against 5.02 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 6.9 kg/ha.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 2.4 times Ethiopia PDR's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 200th and Kiribati ranks 197th of 201 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.02 kg/ha | 4.47 kg/ha | 1.45 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 1970s | 3.26 kg/ha | 5.11 kg/ha | 1.85 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 1980s | 3.9 kg/ha | 5.69 kg/ha | 1.79 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 1990s | 4.9 kg/ha | 6.33 kg/ha | 1.43 kg/ha | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 11.92 kg/ha against 5.02 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Kiribati?
- 6.9 kg/ha, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Kiribati?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Kiribati rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 200th and Kiribati ranks 197th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).