Ethiopia vs Saudi Arabia: Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Ethiopia
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 65.05 kg/ha against 61.28 kg/ha in Ethiopia, a difference of 3.77 kg/ha.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 118th and Saudi Arabia ranks 115th of 186 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 28.22 kg/ha | 57.3 kg/ha | 29.08 kg/ha | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 31.97 kg/ha | 62.92 kg/ha | 30.95 kg/ha | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 44.86 kg/ha | 59.25 kg/ha | 14.39 kg/ha | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 55.77 kg/ha | 65.93 kg/ha | 10.16 kg/ha | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Ethiopia or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 65.05 kg/ha against 61.28 kg/ha in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Ethiopia and Saudi Arabia?
- 3.77 kg/ha, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Saudi Arabia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Ethiopia ranks 118th and Saudi Arabia ranks 115th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).