Japan vs Serbia: Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Japan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 114.62 kg/ha against 110.99 kg/ha in Japan, a difference of 3.63 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 65th and Serbia ranks 62nd of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 127.22 kg/ha | 118.13 kg/ha | 9.09 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2010s | 121.32 kg/ha | 114.45 kg/ha | 6.87 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2020s | 116.88 kg/ha | 117.6 kg/ha | 0.7123 kg/ha | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Japan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 114.62 kg/ha against 110.99 kg/ha in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Japan and Serbia?
- 3.63 kg/ha, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Serbia rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Japan ranks 65th and Serbia ranks 62nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).