Kazakhstan vs Kiribati: Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 14.2 kg/ha against 11.92 kg/ha in Kiribati, a difference of 2.28 kg/ha.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.2 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 179th and Kiribati ranks 182nd of 186 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.04 kg/ha | 6.85 kg/ha | 6.18 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 11.04 kg/ha | 9.89 kg/ha | 1.15 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 14.04 kg/ha | 11.45 kg/ha | 2.59 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 13.9 kg/ha | 11.86 kg/ha | 2.04 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Kazakhstan or Kiribati?
- Kazakhstan, at 14.2 kg/ha against 11.92 kg/ha in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Kazakhstan and Kiribati?
- 2.28 kg/ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kiribati?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kiribati rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 179th and Kiribati ranks 182nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).