Libya vs Yemen: Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Libya
- Yemen
How they compare
Yemen currently reports 19.71 kg/ha against 17.63 kg/ha in Libya, a difference of 2.08 kg/ha.
That makes Yemen's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Yemen ahead.
Libya ranks 190th and Yemen ranks 187th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 4 and Yemen in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.59 kg/ha | 6.15 kg/ha | 1.56 kg/ha | Yemen |
| 1970s | 10.03 kg/ha | 9.64 kg/ha | 0.3907 kg/ha | Libya |
| 1980s | 20.47 kg/ha | 17.26 kg/ha | 3.21 kg/ha | Libya |
| 1990s | 20.15 kg/ha | 17.05 kg/ha | 3.1 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2000s | 22.6 kg/ha | 20.56 kg/ha | 2.05 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2010s | 19.71 kg/ha | 25.92 kg/ha | 6.21 kg/ha | Yemen |
| 2020s | 15.9 kg/ha | 19.22 kg/ha | 3.32 kg/ha | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Libya or Yemen?
- Yemen, at 19.71 kg/ha against 17.63 kg/ha in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Libya and Yemen?
- 2.08 kg/ha, with Yemen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Yemen?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Yemen rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Libya ranks 190th and Yemen ranks 187th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).